|
Senior Moment© Copyright© 2005 All Rights Reserved A Publication of http://www.senior2senior.org
******************** Vol 2 #9 May 15, 2006 ********************
This is a one hundred percent opt-in newsletter with a two hundred percent anti-spam policy. You or someone using your name and email address signed up to receive this newsletter. We publish twice monthly and welcome all opinions, critiques, and topical articles.
Subscription link: http://www.senior2senior.org/newsletter.html Unsubscribe link is located at the end of this newsletter. Senior Pride Car Ribbon Magnet: http://www.senior2senior.org/ribbon.html Caregiver Manual updates: http://www.senior2senior.org/update.html Senior Moment© NL archives: http://www.senior2senior.org/archive.html Senior2Senior Blogs: http://seniorresources.blogspot.com http://senior2senior.wordpress.com
Content:
1. Publisher’s Comments 2. Article
Publisher’s Comments
I added a note to the microwave article at:
http://www.senior2senior.org/microwave.html
which should help clarify the safety of microwave cooking. ----- ----- ----- The high cost of health care has refueled a debate over the status of health care – some call it a privilege some call it a right. The right vs. privilege debate is not unique to health care as you already know.
I say it is a right if the practitioners - doctors, nurses, universities, hospitals, etc. – have accepted federal money during their education or in the case of provider institutions like hospitals, construction. You see, federal money is some of mine, some of yours, some of his, in short, it has been gathered from all of us.
Simply because it is spent in the health care arena doesn’t change its origin or character. If a recipient accepted federal dollars, they now have a responsibility to pay me back, not in cash but in services. I’ll stop here and ask for your input. Please go to:
http://www.senior2senior.org/survey.html
and cast your vote. ----- ----- ----- This is the sig line for a heck of a nice guy:
Writing for Seniors
A newsletter from the www.writing4seniors.org website, a place where readers and writers with a few decades of experience can feel comfortable coming together online.
Steve Williams has a great idea and he’d like your participation. If you’ve ever had the urge to write a few words, Steve wants to hear from you. http://www.writing4seniors.org ----- ----- ----- Under the “this program actually pays” category, yours truly received a check, not a big one, but a check as per their promise to pay.
The url: http://www.surveysavvy.com/?id=1967530
I know some of you participate in “get paid” programs and thought I’d tell you about one in which I participate. It is an honest program therefore it is in this NL. ----- ----- ----- I have been following the alternative fuel arena and it looks like the clear, at least for now, winner is ethanol. The predictors are telling us upwards to 15% of us will be burning ethanol in our gas tanks within five years. Another percentage will be burning gas + ethanol with the remainder still burning gas.
Because it takes upwards to 30% of corn’s energy to make ethanol, it is still relatively inefficient. A alternative energy NL says hemp is the answer. You know, the marijuana plant. It seems this baby is twice as efficient as corn and can be grown virtually almost anywhere.
I am not advocating marijuana, I am repeating what the proponents have said of its value as a fuel producer. The person writing the article said he doesn’t use marijuana but would grow hemp for the return.
Something to think about, right? ----- ----- ----- The U.S. GAO blasted the FDA for the drug safety debacle. The report is at:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06402.pdf
The GAO can put you to sleep but not if you drug safety is on your mind. ----- ----- ----- There is another debate centered around baby boomers and seniors. That debate is how to market to us, you know sell us stuff. I have my own ideas but would be very interested in knowing the approach you like. Email me at: tom@senior2senior.org with your thoughts. ----- ----- -----
2. Article
Drug Companies And Their Hocus Pocus By Tom Koziol as extracted from another NL
I receive the Bottom Line Secrets NL and in their May 7, 2006 edition one of the things they talked about was drug company tactics. The author of the article interviewed Marcia Angell, MD Harvard Medical School, Department of Social Medicine.
For brevity I will only put two of the questions in this space. Question one:
The increased costs of drugs reflect large investments in research and development (R&D), right?
Dr. Angell: Drug industry sources say the R&D cost per drug is $800 million, on average. An independent analysis by the nonprofit consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen shows the real cost is probably $100 million or less.
Actually, the big drug companies don’t develop most of the novel medications. These drugs, such as the cancer medications paclitaxel (Taxol) and imatinib (Gleevec), mostly are the result of taxpayer-funded research at small biotechnology companies.
Question two: New drugs are constantly being brought to market, correct?
Dr. Angell: Of the 487 drugs approved by the FDA from 1998 through 2003, only 32% contained new active ingredients and fewer than half of those (14% of the total) were classified by the FDA as improvements over older drugs.
Most “new” drugs are chemical variations of older drugs already on the market – so called “me-too” drugs. Companies try to grab a piece of a profitable market by producing a medication similar to a top-selling drug.
Example: Mevacor, approved in 1987, was the first cholesterol-lowering statin in the marketplace. Now, there are five more, all variants of the original – Lipitor, Zocor, Pravachol. Lescol and Crestor. Even though Lipitor and Zocor are the top-selling statins, no head-to-head studies have been conducted comparing their effectiveness with Iovastatin (the cheaper generic form of Mevacor) when taken at equivalent doses.
These two questions represent the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the mini exposé in this particular issue. It is no wonder big pharma wants our access to supplements and natural products severely restricted.
As always, please do your own research.
Until next issue,
Tom Koziol
Write to:
Senior Outreach Ministries P.O. Box 1234 Reno, NV 89504
|